Thursday January 25th 0 tactics
It is said the very act of measuring, drives self improvement. So Thursday January 25th I did 0 tactical problems.
posted by takchess @ 4:15 AM
Friday, January 26, 2007
About Me
- Name: takchess
- Location: New Hampshire, new england, United States
There exists an extremely large group of chess players who are no longer beginners nor, on the other hand, masters or point hunters, but players who aim primarily at deriving an aesthetic satisfaction from the game. For such players an attacking game is more attractive than positional technique and they will continue to attack regardless of risk., for their stormy contest are not going to be noted down in theoretical textbooks. From the introduction to Art of Attack in Chess :Vukovic
Previous Posts
- A Wandering Tour through the Traxler Counter-Attack
- What the cool kids play
- Silicide Post 2
- Silicide 1 e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 (part 1)
- Poor Execution Leading to a Loss
- Another HH game and the Alapin Gambit
- Herb Healy Update
- If I have to play a Sicilian
- Open Games
- Tactics or Positional ? Semantics?
4 Comments:
At 10:07 AM,
H.K. said…
Add that to my 0 last night and the night before and we are still at a toal of 0
At 12:25 AM,
Montse said…
well done keep going. You next tactical problem will either be a 100% improvement or failure
At 12:10 PM,
Edukator said…
Who said tactics were 99% of the game? My guess is that, if he applied that to actually studying tactics, he burned out 99% faster than the normal Joe.
At 12:05 PM,
Anonymous said…
I know a bit about chess openings. :)
Still, the dirty little secret is that tactics are king in every phase of the game. If you want a great book on chess openings - that does not teach you how to play a single opening - get Neishtadt's Catastrophe in the Chess Opening which is not to be confused with a newer book with the same name.
Mike Leahy
The Datase Man
Post a Comment
<< Home